Too Twisted to Stomach.
Who’s that Foolish Monk dares to sit next to this beauty unless he’ll jump the plane before landing?
United Airlines treated an American professional woman who was booked on one of their flights as a second class citizen, in their effort to be accommodating to Islamists. Two Pakistani monks, being too pure to have contact with the “deplorable” and dirty female, asked the airline to move the woman out of their row. And they complied.
What is their opinion of their own mothers, one might wonder, who cared for them and in the process came into contact with them while they were growing up. Are they now, having received their religious indoctrination, aware of how filthy their own mothers are as well? The contamination would appear to be most thorough in the space between the left ear and the right ear of these two Pakistani infidel haters. They expect and demand the civilized Americans to accommodate their beliefs and demean half of our population in that regard, though they surely have a low opinion of the rest of us as well.
Mary Campos says her pre-booked ticket was given away by United Airlines. The reason? She’s a woman, and two men didn’t want to sit next to a female.
Mary Campos, of Coto de Caza, CA, told their local CBS affiliate that just prior to boarding a flight to Houston last Monday, she was met at the boarding area by a gate agent who handed her a new boarding pass.
“He said this is your new seat,” Campos said, “And I said, ‘Excuse me?’ He said, ‘I don’t know how to tell you this. The two gentlemen seated next to you have cultural beliefs that prevent them for sitting next to, or talking to or communicating with females.”
Campos told the reporter, “I thought I lived in a culture where women were equal to men.” She accepted her new seat assignment, saying she had no choice. She later wrote a letter to the CEO of United Airlines. She asked, in part, “What if I were handicapped, or transgender? What if your entire crew were female? Any belief that prevents individuals from interacting with females should not travel on commercial aircraft.”
How many accommodations do they demand in their “pure” lives? If they go to Wal-Mart and there are no males working the register do they demand a new register be opened? What if they’re approaching a toll on an interstate and the attendant is a female. Do they stop traffic and back up to the nearest available wholesome man. And what if that person only looks like a man but is actually wearing nail polish and identifying as something else. What do they do in an emergency situation like that?
The idiocy and bias wasn’t restricted to the two arrogant backward Pakistani third-worlders. Obviously the airline granted them their sexist requests, giving it legitimacy it didn’t deserve. But they didn’t have time to respond properly to the complaint of Campos until the news people go involved. Then they issued a predictable politically correct non-answer.
A company spokesperson said, “We regret that Ms. Campos was unhappy with the handling of the seat assignments on her flight. United holds its employees to the highest standards of professionalism and has zero tolerance for discrimination.” Zero tolerance means you don’t practice or permit something. Since United engaged in sex-based discrimination, those claims are patently false.
Noting that female flight crew members were not “allowed to serve” the backward Pakistani monks, Campos said, “We can’t discriminate against half the population for a belief from another nation.”
The infidel just doesn’t believe in diversity and tolerance, would be the liberal response from the caliphate promoting left. She more accurately doesn’t believe in hypocrisy or in Americans being treated as if they are second class citizens in their own country, particularly at the behest of some ungrateful, arrogant and hateful intruders posing as “religious” monks. The Pakistani monks were the ones who were intolerant, after all, making selfish demands that they expected to be met.
Campos hasn’t yet decided if she will sue the airline, it depends upon their handling of two demands she has of her own. United can apologize to every female who was on that plane, including their own employees and change their policy so there is no repeat of the mishandling. Absent those conditions being met, she says she’ll do whatever she has to do to protect women’s rights.
She’s protecting American’s rights and our Constitution as well. There are many Americans who will support her if she chooses to go the legal route. Money is the language that these overly “important” executives speak. It’s the only thing that gets their attention.